On 11/16/2021 3:30 AM, Ridley Combs wrote: > Because it was faster to write a trivial implementation than to track down an > existing one.
Not a good reason... > Even now that I've found a couple, one's a static in videotoolboxenc and is > somewhat heavier than is warranted here, and one's in cbs_h2645 and is way > heavier than is warranted. Any particular one in mind that I could use? I suspect Andreas or James have an opinion on this. - Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
