On 6 Oct 2021, at 11:57, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi
Should the next release be called "LTS"?
No, we can specify it *as* LTS but it should still have an actual name.
The danger in calling it 'LTS' is that it will then be confusing if we
specify other releases as LTS: do we mean an LTS release or the release
called 'LTS'?
Though it is definitely a good to start specifying specific releases as
LTS, it should definitely be discussed how this is done. Will we
maintain two versions per major, i.e. a LTS like 4.1 and then the latest
in the major 4.4? I think this would make the most sense, limiting the
burden of maintainership as much as possible.
Those who want a very stable release stay on the LTS minor within the
major version and those who want a stable major stay on the latest minor
within the major.
Should the next release be 4.5 or 5.0 ?
5.0
Should it be made in december 2021 ? (as was suggested in jbs release
mail)
This seems reasonable.
--
J. Dekker
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
