> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:25 PM, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > This looks hacky. av_dynarray_add() is supposed to many an array of > pointers, and here you twist it enough to reinterpret-cast an int to a > pointer. > > Yes, this looks hacky. Earlier I was using int **number, passing address of element to add, and then using *number[i] to get the value of the element as you can see in the patch.
> I think av_dynarray2_add() might be the correct function to > use here. Then your array can actually be an array of ints. > (These dynarray functions are really a mess...) > _______________________________________________ > > I can try av_dynarray2_add(). Which one of these three do you think will be a better choice? -- Niklesh Lalwani Third Year Undergraduate Electrical Engineering IIT Bombay _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
