On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 12:54:02PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > On 9/29/2021 12:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 10:19:48PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > > > On 9/28/2021 7:28 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > > Fixes: Timeout > > > > Fixes: > > > > 39089/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-ffmpeg_AV_CODEC_ID_MSNSIREN_fuzzer-6677219854909440 > > > > > > > > Found-by: continuous fuzzing process > > > > https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/tree/master/projects/ffmpeg > > > > Suggested-by: James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> > > > > --- > > > > libavcodec/siren.c | 6 +++++- > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/libavcodec/siren.c b/libavcodec/siren.c > > > > index 7f084172a4c..8c9628e2d8e 100644 > > > > --- a/libavcodec/siren.c > > > > +++ b/libavcodec/siren.c > > > > @@ -447,6 +447,8 @@ static int decode_envelope(SirenContext *s, > > > > GetBitContext *gb, > > > > int index = 0; > > > > do { > > > > + if (get_bits_left(gb) < 4) > > > > > > If the idea is that there will be enough bits to read rate_control after > > > this function returns, then this should also take into account the > > > get_bits1() below. > > > > Do you suggest that this is merged with 3/3 or do you suggest something > > else ? > > I was thinking making this a < 5 check, so it's guaranteed there's one for > index inside this do while loop plus four for rate_control after returning > from this function, but i hadn't looked at the 3/3 patch when i wrote that, > and now i see it actually adds a consideration for that. > > LGTM then. And no opinion about squashing them. Do as you prefer.
will apply seperatly thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Concerning the gods, I have no means of knowing whether they exist or not or of what sort they may be, because of the obscurity of the subject, and the brevity of human life -- Protagoras
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".