On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 05:56:36PM +0000, Soft Works wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of > > Michael Niedermayer > > Sent: Sunday, 26 September 2021 18:52 > > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg- > > de...@ffmpeg.org> > > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter/elbg: Extend filter to > > include alpha values in the quantization procedure > > > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 04:57:25AM +0000, Soft Works wrote: > > > Usage example: > > > > > > ffmpeg -y -loglevel verbose -i "..\fate-suite\apng\o_sample.png" - > > filter_complex "elbg=pal8=1:use_alpha=1" -frames:v 1 out.png > > > > > > Signed-off-by: softworkz <softwo...@hotmail.com> > > > --- > > > doc/filters.texi | 4 ++++ > > > libavfilter/vf_elbg.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++--------- > > > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > will apply > > Thank you. > > Please allow me another note: I think the naming of this filter > is terrible. I've gone through the list of all ffmpeg filters > many more times than the typical user, but without the specific > pointers I had gotten from you and a few other devs, I would > have never identified the "elbg" filter as something that > would do what I'm looking for.
i would tend to agree, yes, in fact i think
finding filters based on what they do is hard
and iam not sure their names alone should be how they need to be found
thx
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Old school: Use the lowest level language in which you can solve the problem
conveniently.
New school: Use the highest level language in which the latest supercomputer
can solve the problem without the user falling asleep waiting.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
