Soft Works: > v4 Update: > > - Re-sending due to Patchwork having failed to parse my patchset > There seems to be a bug in Patchwork when parallel processing is > enabled. > This time, I'll send the e-mails slowly, one after another. >
The reason is that there are no in-reply-to headers in your mails, which is why neither MUAs nor patchwork recognize the series as a series. (Also notice that at least outlook mangles your mails, in particular the message-id (and adds the original message-id as X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID); but it does not mangle the in-reply-to field correspondingly, which also breaks threading. I get around this by first sending the first mail of a patchset and then sending all the other mails with "--no-thread --start-number=2 --numbered --in-reply-to=<the mangled message-id of the first mail>". But your mails actually lack both the X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID as well as the in-reply-to headers.) - Andreas _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".