Soft Works:
> v4 Update:
> 
> - Re-sending due to Patchwork having failed to parse my patchset
>   There seems to be a bug in Patchwork when parallel processing is 
>   enabled. 
>   This time, I'll send the e-mails slowly, one after another.
> 

The reason is that there are no in-reply-to headers in your mails, which
is why neither MUAs nor patchwork recognize the series as a series.

(Also notice that at least outlook mangles your mails, in particular the
message-id (and adds the original message-id as
X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID); but it does not mangle the in-reply-to
field correspondingly, which also breaks threading. I get around this by
first sending the first mail of a patchset and then sending all the
other mails with "--no-thread --start-number=2 --numbered
--in-reply-to=<the mangled message-id of the first mail>". But your
mails actually lack both the X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID as well as
the in-reply-to headers.)

- Andreas
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to