9 Sept 2021, 12:02 by geo...@nsup.org: > Speaking as the maintainer of libavfilter, and without closing any > further discussion, I say: the duration of a frame is currently defined > as the difference with the timestamp of the next frame, and it should > continue to be. If a duration field is added to the frame, it will only > be used by the framework and/or select few utility filters to fill in > information that may be missing. >
That's fine, no argument about this. We talked about this on IRC and I agreed that duration fields on frames make no sense and are difficult to guarantee. One thing though, "Speaking as the maintainer of libavfilter"? Please don't discredit Paul, he maintains and cares about lavfi just as much as you do. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".