Hi, On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 1:13 PM ffmpegandmahanstreamer <ffmpegandmahanstreamer@e.email> wrote:
> August 14, 2021 1:01 PM, "Nicolas George" <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > > > ffmpegandmahanstreamer (12021-08-14): > > > >> The real person winning here is Soft Works. He must be laughing right > now. > >> > >> Ah, your math degree coming into work here - "if and only if" ;) > >> Dont make broad generalizations however. > >> > >> Careful there. Don't you remember anything about the libav split? > > > > Do you have a point, or are you just trying to make the discussion more > > unpleasant than it already is? > > > I've made my point. The people have spoken. Some multiple times. > The point is you are the only one against the change, the consensus all > seems to be in favor of Soft's proposal. > I'm not sure I support it, I'd have to look closely. I understand the appeal of "dev env wrappers" for drive-by development and would encourage it for that, but I'm not sure I would use it myself unless adopted project-wide. Using a wrapper is always a somewhat suboptimal experience. Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
