On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 09:07:14PM -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfre...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
> > <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> The long version:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ath should approximate the shape of the absolute hearing threshold, so
> >>>>> yes, it's best if it really uses the minimum, since that will prevent
> >>>>> clipping of the ath curve and result in a more accurate threshold
> >>>>> computation.
> >>>>
> >>>> So you agree with my patch fixing minath?
> >>>> Or would you prefer a version with:
> >>>> minath = ath(3410 - 0.733 * ATH_ADD, ATH_ADD)
> >>>
> >>> Well, that's not really closer to the minimum (a few tests with gnuplot
> >>> say).
> >>
> >> Are you sure your plots were done correctly?
> >> Because I'm quite sure this is the correct first order approximation
> >> of the minimum.
> >>
> >> For ATH_ADD = 4 this gives 3407.068, which is quite close to Michael's
> >> value
> >> (3407.080774800152).
> >
> > I checked the formula several times, but still, I could have made a mistake.
>
>
> This is what I did if you want to check it out (maybe you spot the mistake)
>
> gnuplot> ath(f,a) = _ath(f/1000.0, a)
> gnuplot> _ath(f,a) = 3.64 * f**(-0.8) - 6.8 * exp(-0.6 * (f-3.4) *
> (f-3.4)) + 6.0 * exp(-0.15 * (f-8.7) * (f-8.7)) + (0.6 + 0.04 * a) *
> 0.001 * f * f * f
^^^^^^^^^^
missing * falso IIRC gnuplot is just double precission depending on how many decimal places one wants to calculate this can become a limitation [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it. -- Voltaire
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
