On 2021-08-01 23:59, Soft Works wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of
Nicolas George
Sent: Sunday, 1 August 2021 19:02
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-
de...@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter: add (a)separate filters

Paul B Mahol (12021-08-01):
Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>
---
  doc/filters.texi         |  31 ++++
  libavfilter/Makefile     |   2 +
  libavfilter/allfilters.c |   2 +
  libavfilter/f_separate.c | 346
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  4 files changed, 381 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 libavfilter/f_separate.c
Did not review the code.

Separate seems the wrong word: afaik, it is to be used when things of
different nature have gotten mixed together.

Split would be the best choice, and in line with mkvmerge options, but it is
already used.

Maybe timesplit. Or segment.
I think timesplit is a good choice because it would align with the "split"
filter which is creating multiple outputs as well.
"segment" would cause confusion as there's already the "segment muxer".

segment is more intuitive because it's a direct match. We already have concat as a protocol / demuxer / filter; users will manage.

Gyan
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to