在2021年7月29日七月 下午5:29，yinshiyou...@loongson.cn写道：
> > -----原始邮件-----
> > 发件人: "Jiaxun Yang" <jiaxun.y...@flygoat.com>
> > 发送时间: 2021-07-29 14:32:35 (星期四)
> > 收件人: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> > 抄送: yinshiyou...@loongson.cn, "Jiaxun Yang" <jiaxun.y...@flygoat.com>
> > 主题: [PATCH] avcodec/mips: Support old style mmi instruction mnemonics
> >
> > Loongson had renamed serval instruction mnemonics to distinguish
> > integral and simd opreations. In ebedd26 ("libavcodec/mips: Fix
> > specification of instruction name"), all old style mnemonics are
> > replaced by the new one.
> > However, upstream GCC doesn't support new style mnemonics, it breaks
> > build.
> > As stated by Loongson, their GCC toolchain support both style while
> > clang only support the new one, we'll use new style for clang only.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.y...@flygoat.com>
> > ---
> > libavcodec/mips/blockdsp_mmi.c | 8 +-
> > libavcodec/mips/h264chroma_mmi.c | 20 +--
> > libavcodec/mips/h264dsp_mmi.c | 288 +++++++++++++++---------------
> > libavcodec/mips/h264pred_mmi.c | 18 +-
> > libavcodec/mips/h264qpel_mmi.c | 26 +--
> > libavcodec/mips/hevcdsp_mmi.c | 32 ++--
> > libavcodec/mips/hpeldsp_mmi.c | 26 +--
> > libavcodec/mips/idctdsp_mmi.c | 2 +-
> > libavcodec/mips/mpegvideo_mmi.c | 94 +++++-----
> > libavcodec/mips/pixblockdsp_mmi.c | 8 +-
> > libavcodec/mips/simple_idct_mmi.c | 14 +-
> > libavcodec/mips/vc1dsp_mmi.c | 34 ++--
> > libavcodec/mips/vp3dsp_idct_mmi.c | 132 +++++++-------
> > libavcodec/mips/vp8dsp_mmi.c | 80 ++++-----
> > libavcodec/mips/vp9_mc_mmi.c | 10 +-
> > libavcodec/mips/wmv2dsp_mmi.c | 2 +-
> > libavutil/mips/mmiutils.h | 22 +++
> > 17 files changed, 419 insertions(+), 397 deletions(-)
>
>
> >
>
> I suggest adding 'pxor' check in configure
Hmm, I don't think it's worthy to hava a configure option for this.
>
> and adding 'pxor' support in upstream gcc/clang.
For clang I don't think it's possible as we don't have loongson mmi support in
upstream codebase.
For GCC I'd like to have a try but I need a full list of instructions needs to
be converted as I asked in another thread.
Also given that we've already have many users with older toolchain and it's
impossible to let them upgrade at once, this method could address the issue
without trouble present users.
Thanks.
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
>
--
- Jiaxun
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
