On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 12:20:01AM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > On 18.04.2015 23:34, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 10:28:53PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > >> I don't think an assert would be good here. If you want to protect against > >> future code changes, I would rather leave the error return. > >> But I'd also be fine with dropping this check altogether. > >> What do you prefer? > > > > whatever you prefer, the important part is to add checks where they > > are needed > > OK, then lets keep both checks as in the second patch I sent.
applied thanks [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB No great genius has ever existed without some touch of madness. -- Aristotle
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
