On Thu, 1 Jul 2021, Jan Ekström wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 5:16 PM James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Matthieu Patou <mpa...@fb.com>
Suggested-by: ffm...@fb.com
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com>
---
For the record, if Big Companies such as FB or Bilibili want to keep
on dragging FLV/RTMP around I recommend:
1. Create something like
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cellar-codec/ for FLV.
2. Have Adobe refer to that registry as the Point of Truth in their
spec/document.
That way we have a spec and Adobe does not have to update anything
beyond pointing towards the open codec register.
+1 on something like this. There has to be some sort of official spec for
it, with at least a handwavy acknowledgement from Adobe.
And some more extensible way of signaling codecs might be good like JB
suggests (although it makes the FLV stream much more cumbersome compared
to other codecs), because the field only allows IDs 0-15, out of which
already over half of them are defined, and if defining more of them, we're
very soon out of numbers.
// Martin
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
