James Almer (12021-06-16):
> Since merging lavf and lavf is apparently not an option, I will not be
> against restricting lavf and lavd to matching versions

Please explain why you would be against it otherwise, and why you are
against for other libraries.

Regards,

-- 
  Nicolas George

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to