On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 09:27:32AM +0300, Valerii Zapodovnikov wrote: > From: Rémi Achard <remiach...@gmail.com> > > Patch should be applied to decode XYZ samples with not native > decoder in ffmpeg (-c:v libopenjpeg, not -c:v jpeg2000). jpeg2000 > works already. > Now, this is AFAIK a patch that should be applied after upstream's > patch: https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/pull/1200 > Please note that jpeg2000 XYZ is not bitperfect compared to openjpeg > see #4829#comment:3. Some pixels will be different, like in sYCC. I > consider both bugs. Also pixel_format can be forced by > "-pixel_format xyz12le". > --- > libavcodec/libopenjpegdec.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
This breaks build
libavcodec/libopenjpegdec.c: In function ‘libopenjpeg_guess_pix_fmt’:
libavcodec/libopenjpegdec.c:203:14: error: ‘opj_image_t {aka const struct
opj_image}’ has no member named ‘rsiz’
if (image->rsiz == FF_PROFILE_JPEG2000_DCINEMA_2K ||
^~
libavcodec/libopenjpegdec.c:204:14: error: ‘opj_image_t {aka const struct
opj_image}’ has no member named ‘rsiz’
image->rsiz == FF_PROFILE_JPEG2000_DCINEMA_4K) {
^~
ffbuild/common.mak:67: recipe for target 'libavcodec/libopenjpegdec.o' failed
make: *** [libavcodec/libopenjpegdec.o] Error 1
changes to configure, version / feature checks are missing
thx
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
The real ebay dictionary, page 1
"Used only once" - "Some unspecified defect prevented a second use"
"In good condition" - "Can be repaird by experienced expert"
"As is" - "You wouldnt want it even if you were payed for it, if you knew ..."
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
