Am So., 11. Apr. 2021 um 17:25 Uhr schrieb Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com>:
>
> I think this is invalid.
> Give explanation why you think your approach is correct one.
>
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 4:54 PM Zhong Li <zhongli_...@126.com> wrote:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Zhong Li <zhongli_...@126.com>
> > ---
> > libavfilter/vf_cas.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/libavfilter/vf_cas.c b/libavfilter/vf_cas.c
> > index 7c32ed5f9b..b44a100421 100644
> > --- a/libavfilter/vf_cas.c
> > +++ b/libavfilter/vf_cas.c
> > @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static int cas_slice8(AVFilterContext *avctx, void *arg,
> > int jobnr, int nb_jobs)
> > const uint8_t *src = in->data[p];
> >
> > if (!((1 << p) & s->planes)) {
> > - av_image_copy_plane(dst, linesize, src + slice_start *
> > linesize, in_linesize,
> > + av_image_copy_plane(dst, linesize, src + slice_start *
> > in_linesize, in_linesize,
It looks to me as if before the patch the (output) linesize was
combined with the (input) src pointer which is surprising.
Carl Eugen
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
