This check is outdated because the caller doesn't need to check that
the multiplication overflows when using av_realloc_array() (the code
in question used av_realloc() before that); furthermore, the check
is also a remnant of the time in which our allocation functions
didn't use size_t parameters.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinha...@gmail.com>
---
It would btw make more sense for AVFormatContext.max_streams to be
unsigned.

 libavformat/utils.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libavformat/utils.c b/libavformat/utils.c
index 524765aeb4..88f6f18f1f 100644
--- a/libavformat/utils.c
+++ b/libavformat/utils.c
@@ -4493,9 +4493,10 @@ AVStream *avformat_new_stream(AVFormatContext *s, const 
AVCodec *c)
     int i;
     AVStream **streams;
 
-    if (s->nb_streams >= FFMIN(s->max_streams, INT_MAX/sizeof(*streams))) {
-        if (s->max_streams < INT_MAX/sizeof(*streams))
-            av_log(s, AV_LOG_ERROR, "Number of streams exceeds max_streams 
parameter (%d), see the documentation if you wish to increase it\n", 
s->max_streams);
+    if (s->nb_streams >= s->max_streams) {
+        av_log(s, AV_LOG_ERROR, "Number of streams exceeds max_streams 
parameter"
+               " (%d), see the documentation if you wish to increase it\n",
+               s->max_streams);
         return NULL;
     }
     streams = av_realloc_array(s->streams, s->nb_streams + 1, 
sizeof(*streams));
-- 
2.27.0

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to