On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 2:57 PM Pavel Koshevoy <pkoshe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 2:51 PM Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, 17 Mar 2021, Pavel Koshevoy wrote: >> >> > Preserve AV_PKT_FLAG_CORRUPT so the caller can decide whether to drop >> > the packet. >> >> LGTM, but Michael was against it last time: >> >> >> https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/patch/20181009233214.8785-2-...@passwd.hu/ >> >> >> > > I have a source where a corrupt packet is able to poison the video decoder > so that the subsequent video is decoded with severe visual artifacts. My > workaround is to detect corrupt packets, drop them and re-create the video > decoder on the next non-corrupt packet. This workaround is working well so > far. > > Pavel. > Although, the video decoder being poisoned seems to be a regression in ffmpeg ... the problem doesn't occur with ffmpeg git snapshot from 20190318, 15d016be30bd24cdba514c7c888e9da0286b5647 Pavel. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
