On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 10:17:22PM +0000, Timothy Gu wrote: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 10:42 AM Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> > wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 04:48:24PM +0000, Timothy Gu wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 8:43 PM Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> > > wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > * our fate server lacks the ability to display a user specified release > > > > this makes the output look quite unwieldy > > > > Timothy was working on a rewrite > > > > > > > > > > I haven't touched that thing in a few months but it's in a pretty good > > > shape. With a few minor updates it should be good to go at least on > > > fate-beta.ffmpeg.org or something like that. There are still a few minor > > > things I want to fix (like minirep/minilog, warning diff (is it really > > > useful now since most boxes are using make -jx and testing order changes > > > every time?), and some minor styling issue). > > > > ok, > > do you have your own server where i should make > > fate-beta.ffmpeg.org point to or its something that needs to be setup > > on the fate / or some other server ? > > > > I do have a server I can use for this purpose but i wonder how I am going > to get the FATE data submitted by the boxes if I'm using mine… (which is > another headache when writing my server)
could the existing server be made to forward data to a 2nd server ? then all that gets submited to it would automatically get sent to yours or anyone elses who wants to run one we also might in case of a failure of the server then just change fate.ffmpeg.org to point to yours so this design could be considered to add some redundancy > > Right now I can get the data manually by wgetting files (like > http://fate.ffmpeg.org/aarch64-linux-qemu-ubuntu-gcc-4.8/20150406220127/summary), > but that's a pain in the ass. (Plus those files should not be public > anyway.) > > [...] > > > > and it is not clear to me how the servers are > > > administered (who pays for it? who has access to it? who has access to > > the > > > > main servers are provided by arpi > > > > You mean [git.]ffmpeg.org? ffmpeg.org, samples.ffmpeg.org, trac.ffmpeg.org also note to forget source.ffmpeg.org is provided by videolan > > I know this has been discussed before, but moving to a 3rd-party hosting > service like GitHub Pages might make this significantly easier. Who knows > what repos are still hosted on git.ffmpeg.org? the webpage repos, fateserver, some other random stuff probably too > > fate server by baptiste > > > Baptiste doesn't seem to be active these days. Should I contact him > personally? yes, that would probably be best, i suspect he would miss a mail here [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB While the State exists there can be no freedom; when there is freedom there will be no State. -- Vladimir Lenin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
