Quoting Gyan Doshi (2021-02-03 09:15:35)
>
>
> On 03-02-2021 01:41 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > Quoting Gyan Doshi (2021-02-01 14:22:27)
> >> Useful when encoding in batch or with aberrant inputs.
> >> ---
> >> doc/ffmpeg.texi | 7 +++++++
> >> fftools/ffmpeg.c | 7 ++++++-
> >> fftools/ffmpeg.h | 3 +++
> >> fftools/ffmpeg_opt.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> >> 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> Forgot to nullify rmax with r set.
> >>
> >> diff --git a/doc/ffmpeg.texi b/doc/ffmpeg.texi
> >> index 8eb012b7c0..7726f25082 100644
> >> --- a/doc/ffmpeg.texi
> >> +++ b/doc/ffmpeg.texi
> >> @@ -759,6 +759,13 @@ If in doubt use @option{-framerate} instead of the
> >> input option @option{-r}.
> >> As an output option, duplicate or drop input frames to achieve constant
> >> output
> >> frame rate @var{fps}.
> >>
> >> +@item -rmax[:@var{stream_specifier}] @var{fps} (@emph{output,per-stream})
> > Name could be more descriptive, "rmax" does not tell you much. How about
> > -framerate_clamp or something along these lines?
> >
> We use -r for video framerate, so -rmax is intuitive. But -fpsmax can
> also work.
IIUC this option is useful only under quite specific circumstances. In
such a case, I think it's better to use longer more descriptive names.
--
Anton Khirnov
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
