Anton Khirnov (12021-01-19): > > (Note that I would argue against adding more general display output > > devices which are already present, like fb and xv, because they are > > of essentially no value to libavdevice users. Removing legacy code > > is harder, though.) > > +1 > > IMO libavdevice output devices are worse than useless and should all be > removed. Libavformat API is barely passable for input, but it really is > NOT something you should use to drive outputs.
I use libavdevice in my projects, and these output devices have a lot of value to me. With this kind of user-hostile attitude where you disregard everybody's use case except those you deem valuable, you almost killed the project once. It was ten years ago, time to try again? -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
