On 31/03/15 13:41, Steve Dierker wrote: > Hello List, > > I found another MXF File containing ProRes with the following > codec_uls: 060E2B34040101010E04020102110500 > Therefor I relaxed the pattern. >
Are the Prores variants likely to be that big? Difficult I know for private UL's I wonder if we shouldn't be a little more cautous in widening the scope, where was the sample from? > Related to issue #4349 > --- > libavformat/mxf.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > [...] -- Tim. Key Fingerprint 38CF DB09 3ED0 F607 8B67 6CED 0C0B FC44 8B0B FC83 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
