James Almer (12020-09-08): > It's a macro designed for this specific purpose. Figured it would be > proper, and we're using them in other parts of the code to shift the > values by more than 32 bits, like you're doing here. But yes, i should > have said could, not should. > > I don't consider it less readable, and it's just as long as using a > cast, but of course it's up to you.
I honestly do not know what good these macros do, except for sparking bikeshedding discussions like this one. I can only assume they were meant for barely-complying compilers where the cast would produce an annoying false-positive warning. Anyway, I pushed like this. Thanks for your input. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
