> On Aug 28, 2020, at 3:33 PM, Moritz Barsnick <barsn...@gmx.net> wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 23:31:45 +0800, Zhao Zhili wrote: >>>> I have a same patch long time ago. >>>> >>>> http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2019-October/252193.html >>>> <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2019-October/252193.html> >>>> <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2019-October/252193.html >>>> <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2019-October/252193.html>> >>>> >>> I applied your patch (as 26f81e5e83a015578c4c0c1d121a5e5f6c72bf8a). >> >> Thank you. Current review process is easy to lost track. > > There was an unelaborated "breaks ABI" comment to that patch, which is > why Michael never applied, after originally announcing to do so.
Yes, I understand why it’s not applied. It’s my mistake to forget the patch, but a merge-request/pull-request tracking system is useful in this case. Now I found out patchwork can query with submitter, which is better than nothing. > > Moritz > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
