Alexander Strasser (12020-08-09): > >> Andreas: > > I'm sure the following was addressed at me.
Yes, sorry to both of you. > IMHO we don't actually need ideology for this matter. I hope so. > At least the aspect Mark mentioned below. > > In general I think it could be worded a bit clearer and easier to grasp. > Basically it should ask for a short comment in front of non-obvious data > definitions. > > I can try to write something later or tomorrow. Not sure if I can really come > up with something much better, so I would be OK with your wording if Mark's > comment is addresed. Thanks. I will wait for your proposal, and in the meantime see if I can come up with a better way of saying it myself. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
