On 7/20/20, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 08:31:57PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: >> Paul B Mahol (12020-06-11): >> > Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> >> > --- >> > libavfilter/avfilter.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- >> > libavfilter/filters.h | 17 ++++++++++++ >> > 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> Still no. It makes a very important function much more complex, it would >> be simpler implemented in the filters directly since they are not using >> the full features of the queue. > > shouldnt code which is used by multiple filters be shared and available > to all filters ? > but maybe iam missing something > > And it would be nice if you and paul could come up with some solution > which you both are happy with > because i dont think arbitration by someone is going to make both of > you happy. No matter what the result, likely one at least would be unhappy
Preferring status quo make Nicolas happy. > > Thanks > > [...] > > -- > Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB > > Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated > form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme liberty. -- Plato > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
