Hi, On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Christophe Gisquet < christophe.gisq...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > 2015-03-13 14:34 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at>: > >> They will not be used in any real world scenario. > > > > well it could be usefull in debuging in same cases > > especially if all mmx code is disabled on x86_64, for any single > > function its not too likely > > I believe fate and proper bug reports are here for that, even with > your scenarios. I mean, for instance I can only test Win32/64, but > neither linux x86, PPC nor ARM, so I haven't bought much improvement > with this. > > So I'd, as well as several x86 implementers, prefer the MMX* code not > to be built under ARCH_X86_32. You seemed to be fine with either. > > And this was accepted as an intermediate ground between not keeping > all optimizations that only apply to 15+ yo systems (there are several > people of that opinion), and keeping everything as is. I think the "smaller binary" is sufficiently enough of a reason to disable building that code on 64bit systems. Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
