> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of Guo,
> Yejun
> Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 10:39 AM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] tests/dnn/mathunary: fix the issue of NAN
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of Ting
> > Fu
> > Sent: 2020年7月2日 21:51
> > To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> > Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] tests/dnn/mathunary: fix the issue of
> > NAN
> >
> > When one of output[i] & expected_output is NAN, the unit test will always
> pass.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ting Fu <ting...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > tests/dnn/dnn-layer-mathunary-test.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/dnn/dnn-layer-mathunary-test.c
> > b/tests/dnn/dnn-layer-mathunary-test.c
> > index bf77c44bbe..f251447771 100644
> > --- a/tests/dnn/dnn-layer-mathunary-test.c
> > +++ b/tests/dnn/dnn-layer-mathunary-test.c
> > @@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ static int test(DNNMathUnaryOperation op)
> > output = operands[1].data;
> > for (int i = 0; i < sizeof(input) / sizeof(float); ++i) {
> > float expected_output = get_expected(input[i], op);
> > - if(fabs(output[i] - expected_output) > EPS) {
> > + if ((isnan(output[i]) ^ isnan(expected_output)) ||
> > + fabs(output[i] - expected_output) > EPS) {
>
> it's possible that different platform handles NaN slightly different.
> my suggestion is to describe it simply/clearly to avoid possible issue.
>
> for example.
> A: isnan(output[i]);
> B: isnan(expected_output);
> C: fabs(output[i] - expected_output) > EPS if ( (A&&!B) || (!A&&B) || (!A &&
> !B
> && C) )
>
Hi Yejun,
Thank you for your review. Modified in PATCH V2. The verify logic is as below:
If ( (!A && !B && (ABS_SUB> EPS)) || (A && !B) || (!A && B)).
Thank you
Ting FU
>
> > printf("at index %d, output: %f, expected_output: %f\n",
> > i, output[i], expected_output);
> > av_freep(&output);
> > return 1;
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> >
> > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org
> with subject "unsubscribe".
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
