Kieran Kunhya (12020-07-04): > > i do hope the planned technical committee will help with some of the > > problems you discussed here. > > But sometimes people are also rather rigid in discussions less interrested > > to find a good compromise to move forward with and more interrested in > > "winning" a discussion. That is also not helping and i dont think the > > technical committee should be seen as the solution to this. Its better > > people discuss and agree than to go to some arbitration to decide > > > > The technical committee was created exactly to resolve situations like this. > Instead of the current case where issues are filibustered or blocked by > "maintainers".
I am not sure this is all that is needed. The technical committee can answer for precise questions with a few alternatives: are A's arguments or B's arguments stronger, and should we accept or reject the patch as is? But I do not think it is meant to arbitrate questions about more remote concerns: do we want the project to go in that direction or this direction? It is a different kind of decision. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
