On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 4:39 PM James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 7/1/2020 3:57 PM, James Zern wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:15 AM James Zern <jz...@google.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 5:55 PM Wang Cao <doublee...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Wang Cao <wang...@google.com> > >>> --- > >>> doc/encoders.texi | 21 +++++++++++++++++++ > >>> libavcodec/libaomenc.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > >>> libavcodec/version.h | 2 +- > >>> 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > >>> > >> > >> lgtm. > > > > applied, thanks. > > Are all these options available in 1.0.0? If not, then they need to be > wrapped in a pre-processor check like the other newer options. >
You're right, I had thought these made it to the normative branch, my mistake. I'll send a patch. > I did not remove support for 1.0.0 since that's what Debian, Ubuntu and > other distros with LTS releases ship, and nobody (other than you) > commented when i asked what direction we should take. > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
