On 6/30/20, Tomas Härdin <tjop...@acc.umu.se> wrote:
> lör 2020-06-27 klockan 11:51 +0200 skrev Carl Eugen Hoyos:
>> Am Sa., 27. Juni 2020 um 11:47 Uhr schrieb Tomas Härdin
>> <tjop...@acc.umu.se>:
>> > fre 2020-06-26 klockan 11:36 +0200 skrev Hendrik Leppkes:
>> > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:31 AM Tomas Härdin <tjop...@acc.umu.se>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > ons 2020-06-24 klockan 21:22 +0200 skrev Carl Eugen Hoyos:
>> > > > > Am Mi., 24. Juni 2020 um 21:10 Uhr schrieb rcombs
>> > > > > <rco...@rcombs.me>:
>> > > > > > ---
>> > > > > > libavutil/avutil.h | 4 ++++
>> > > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > diff --git a/libavutil/avutil.h b/libavutil/avutil.h
>> > > > > > index 4d633156d1..c11b33f466 100644
>> > > > > > --- a/libavutil/avutil.h
>> > > > > > +++ b/libavutil/avutil.h
>> > > > > > @@ -257,7 +257,11 @@ const char *av_get_media_type_string(enum
>> > > > > > AVMediaType media_type);
>> > > > > > * Internal time base represented as fractional value
>> > > > > > */
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > +#ifdef __cplusplus
>> > > > > > +#define AV_TIME_BASE_Q AVRational{1, AV_TIME_BASE}
>> > > > > > +#else
>> > > > > > #define AV_TIME_BASE_Q (AVRational){1, AV_TIME_BASE}
>> > > > > > +#endif
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The problem with this patch is that it gives C++ users of the
>> > > > > libraries
>> > > > > the feeling that we would care about them and that we would indeed
>> > > > > fix issues.
>> > > > > Given that the contrary is true (at least in the past) and that we
>> > > > > do
>> > > > > not do any specific C++ testing, I believe it is better to let
>> > > > > users
>> > > > > work around this issue (from their point of you).
>> > > >
>> > > > Maybe we should put in a #warning to that effect? Inside an #ifdef
>> > > > __cplusplus
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Now that would just be annoying. 99% of the headers work just fine in
>> > > C++, spewing a warning at us for using them would not serve anything.
>> >
>> > Well, if you volunteer to maintain C++ support then sure. Most devs in
>> > this project are C guys. Admittedly this is a bit of a Måns-ism, but
>> > he's no longer involved so.. I don't think anyone is principally
>> > opposed, it's just a question of where to spend developer effort.
>>
>> Not sure why you believe we need a warning:
>> Iiuc, currently AV_TIME_BASE_Q cannot be used from C++ programs,
>> any C++ developer will immediately be made aware of this, no?
>
> True, but it's generating threads on the list like this one on a
> regular basis.
>
So we should suffer instead by applying this patch?
> /Tomas
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
