On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 09:43:14PM +0800, lance.lmw...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Limin Wang <lance.lmw...@gmail.com> > > The old fate test is for framecrc and haven't testing timecode info. > so it's better to change to ffprobe and dump them. > > Signed-off-by: Limin Wang <lance.lmw...@gmail.com> > --- > tests/fate/h264.mak | 4 +- > tests/ref/fate/h264-timecode | 3608 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 2 files changed, 3305 insertions(+), 307 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/fate/h264.mak b/tests/fate/h264.mak > index 13a596e..0bf6800 100644 > --- a/tests/fate/h264.mak > +++ b/tests/fate/h264.mak > @@ -196,7 +196,6 @@ FATE_H264 := $(FATE_H264:%=fate-h264-conformance-%) > \ > fate-h264-3386 \ > fate-h264-missing-frame \ > fate-h264-ref-pic-mod-overflow \ > - fate-h264-timecode \ > fate-h264-encparams > > FATE_H264-$(call DEMDEC, H264, H264) += $(FATE_H264) > @@ -228,6 +227,7 @@ FATE_H264-$(call DEMDEC, MXF, H264) += fate-h264-xavc-4389 > FATE_H264-$(call DEMDEC, MOV, H264) += fate-h264-attachment-631 > FATE_H264-$(call DEMDEC, MPEGTS, H264) += fate-h264-skip-nokey > fate-h264-skip-nointra > FATE_H264_FFPROBE-$(call DEMDEC, MATROSKA, H264) += fate-h264-dts_5frames > +FATE_H264_FFPROBE-$(call DEMDEC, H264, H264) += fate-h264-timecode > > FATE_SAMPLES_AVCONV += $(FATE_H264-yes) > FATE_SAMPLES_FFPROBE += $(FATE_H264_FFPROBE-yes) > @@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ fate-h264-twofields-packet: CMD = > framecrc -i $(TARGET_SAM > fate-h264-unescaped-extradata: CMD = framecrc -i > $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/h264/unescaped_extradata.mp4 -an -frames 10 > fate-h264-3386: CMD = framecrc -i > $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/h264/bbc2.sample.h264 > fate-h264-missing-frame: CMD = framecrc -i > $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/h264/nondeterministic_cut.h264 > -fate-h264-timecode: CMD = framecrc -i > $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/h264/crew_cif_timecode-2.h264 > +fate-h264-timecode: CMD = probeframes > -show_entries frame=side_data -select_streams v -i > $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/h264/crew_cif_timecode-2.h264 Note for the fate testing:
I'm trying to use less frames(2-4s) data for fate testing, but the read_intervals option isn't working for the raw h264 file by the actual testing. ./ffprobe -show_entries frame=side_data -read_intervals "%2s" -select_streams v ../fate-suite/h264/crew_cif_timecode-2.h264 |wc -l 2402 ./ffprobe -show_entries frame=side_data -read_intervals "%4s" -select_streams v ../fate-suite/h264/crew_cif_timecode-2.h264 |wc -l 2402 So the patch fate testing is only show no broken for the side data after change. > > fate-h264-reinit-%: CMD = framecrc -i > $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/h264/$(@:fate-h264-%=%).h264 -vf > format=yuv444p10le,scale=w=352:h=288 > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
