On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 10:03:44PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Alternatively these conditions could be treated as errors
> Fixes: 
> 23147/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-ffmpeg_AV_CODEC_ID_FFWAVESYNTH_fuzzer-5639254549200896
> Fixes: signed integer overflow: 9223372036854775807 + 1 cannot be represented 
> in type 'int64_t' (aka 'long')
> 
> Found-by: continuous fuzzing process 
> https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/tree/master/projects/ffmpeg
> Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc>
> ---
>  libavcodec/ffwavesynth.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

will apply

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Asymptotically faster algorithms should always be preferred if you have
asymptotical amounts of data

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to