Anton Khirnov (12020-06-08): > During the last iteration, I asked how is this preferable to just making > a new encoder instance. Don't think I got a sufficient reply.
How do we know that we can just put the packets of the new instance after the packets of the old instance and it will work? It will work for image codecs, of course. It will not work for raw video codecs, since the frame size and characteristics are global. It may work for some codecs. It may work if we generate side data to renew the extra data. Clearly, making a new encoder instance is not an universal solution. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
