Paul B Mahol (12020-06-03): > Why so? Just to be beaten again by same person which would reject this > same patch.
I was not the first one to reject a patch because in introduces APIs or fields without users, but I think it is a good policy. > > "Number of samples already sent through the link" seems more natural. > I copy pasted sentence for frames above. Should it be changed too? I do not think it matters much. > > Above frame counters are not unsigned. Why to do different. If I had noticed it when they were added, I would have suggested they be unsigned too. Signed arithmetic is more tricky, and compiler optimize it less well: if something does not need to be negative, let it be unsigned. -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".