Paul B Mahol (12020-06-03):
> Why so? Just to be beaten again by same person which would reject this
> same patch.

I was not the first one to reject a patch because in introduces APIs or
fields without users, but I think it is a good policy.

> > "Number of samples already sent through the link" seems more natural.
> I copy pasted sentence for frames above. Should it be changed too?

I do not think it matters much.
> 
> Above frame counters are not unsigned. Why to do different.

If I had noticed it when they were added, I would have suggested they be
unsigned too. Signed arithmetic is more tricky, and compiler optimize it
less well: if something does not need to be negative, let it be
unsigned.

-- 
  Nicolas George

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to