> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of > Mark Thompson > Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2020 00:15 > To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 4/4] vaapi_encode_h265: Enable 4:2:2 > support > > On 05/03/2020 02:49, Fu, Linjie wrote: > > 2. recon surface of Y210 or 444 (AYUV and Y410 in media-driver) depends > on the surface hint [3] in > > libva and corresponding code in media-driver to resize the recon surface > which is not upstreamed > > yet. > > What is the reasoning for forcing the user to pass new extra attributes with > this rather than handling it transparently so that it works like all other > encoders? > > In some places in Mesa surfaces are reallocated with different properties > when they are used for a purpose they don't currently support, which avoids > weird constraints being exported to the user (e.g. see > <https://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/tree/src/gallium/state_trackers/v > a/surface.c#n1000>). Since reconstructed picture surfaces are pretty unlikely > to be used for anything else (just being copied out for debugging maybe?), it > seems like an answer like that would be simpler in this case too. (Though > perhaps I'm missing something weird about the Intel hardware which makes > this case uglier.) >
Implemented the surface reallocation inside media driver in [1], merged the query support in [2], verified that it works for both AYUV(or XYUV)/Y410, yuyv422. And for Y210, it seems to be better to implement render target support in vaapi_encoder in this patch as well: { "YUV422_10", VA_RT_FORMAT_YUV422_10, 10, 3, 1, 0 }, Hence patch LGTM with or without above modifications, thx. - Linjie [1] < https://github.com/intel/media-driver/pull/915> [2] < https://github.com/intel/media-driver/pull/855> _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".