On 5/14/20, Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 14 May 2020, Marton Balint wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 14 May 2020, Nicolas George wrote:
>>
>>> Marton Balint (12020-05-14):
>>>> I am not a huge fan of this patch, mafd refers to a score between this
>> frame
>>>> and the previous frame, we cannot ensure that there were no additional
>> frame
>>>> processing between scdet and this filter which may have duplicated or
>>>> removed frames. So I'd rather not add this feature.
>>>
>>> It can only happen if the user has put filters in the middle. I move we
>>> trust users who insert such obscure filters to do what they want to, or
>>> to fix their issues if they have some.
>>
>> Fine, I am not blocking this if null pointer deref issues are fixed.
>>
>> I think we can also assume that if the metadata exists, it will contain a
>> valid number, so I suggest this code:
>>
>> e_mafd = av_dict_get(next->metadata, "lavfi.scd.mafd", NULL,
>> AV_DICT_MATCH_CASE);
>> if (e_mafd) {
>> mafd = strtod(e_mafd->value, NULL);
>> } else {
>> s->sad(crnt->data[0], crnt->linesize[0], next->data[0],
>> next->linesize[0], crnt->width, crnt->height, &sad);
>> emms_c();
>> mafd = (double)sad * 100.0 / (crnt->width * crnt->height) / (1
>>
>> << s->bitdepth);
>> }
>
> Why this patch was committed without a recent review???
>
Looks like repeating occurrence? Remove commit rights?
> Thanks,
> Marton
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
