Sorry, Resolved bug is this: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/aomedia/issues/detail?id=2639
and we no longer need these lines: + rawimg->planes[AOM_PLANE_U] = frame->data[0]; + rawimg->planes[AOM_PLANE_V] = frame->data[0]; + rawimg->stride[AOM_PLANE_U] = frame->linesize[0]; + rawimg->stride[AOM_PLANE_V] = frame->linesize[0]; 2020年5月10日(日) 0:59 Ryo Hirafuji <ryo.hiraf...@link-u.co.jp>: > Hi. > > https://crbug.com/aomedia/2545 > > This bug is resolved and we no longer need these lines to avoid crash in > libaom. > > > - rawimg->planes[AOM_PLANE_U] = frame->data[1]; > > - rawimg->planes[AOM_PLANE_V] = frame->data[2]; > > - rawimg->stride[AOM_PLANE_U] = frame->linesize[1]; > > - rawimg->stride[AOM_PLANE_V] = frame->linesize[2]; > > I can create and send a new patch without these workaround lines, but of > course, it will crash if the ffmpeg will be built with older versions of > libaom. > How should I resolve this backward compatibility issue? or I don't have to > consider it? > > Please give me some advice. > > > 2020年4月16日(木) 2:58 James Zern <jzern-at-google....@ffmpeg.org>: > >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 8:14 AM James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > On 4/14/2020 9:26 PM, James Zern wrote: >> > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:57 AM Ryo Hirafuji < >> ryo.hiraf...@link-u.co.jp> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> Thanks for the review! >> > >> >> > >> This should bump the micro version number in libavcodec/version.h. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> OK, I will bump up the version when the problem below is solved. >> > >> >> > > >> > > If we want to go for compatibility with different versions of the >> > > library we could move forward with the patch as is, though it would be >> > > simpler to just treat this as a bug fix in libaom. >> > >> > Once a new version of libaom is tagged (Hopefully soon, since it's been >> > almost two years since 1.0.0), we could set it as the minimum >> > requirement and forget about 1.0.0, since that version is by now >> > essentially unusable. >> > >> >> Thanks, that was my hope. I just wasn't sure how long we wanted to >> wait before changing the minimum. You're right though, the only tags >> are old and were more for bitstream compatibility rather than encoder >> functionality. A full release should be coming soon [1] and with more >> regular frequency after that. >> >> [1] https://crbug.com/aomedia/2545 >> _______________________________________________ >> ffmpeg-devel mailing list >> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org >> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel >> >> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email >> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
