On 5/1/2020 2:23 PM, Dale Curtis wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 6:12 AM James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 5/1/2020 6:36 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>>
>>> The macro exists to avoid separate patches?
>>
>> No, it exists to not require configure checks just to enable a path for
>> gcc/clang and another for other compilers.
>>
>
> Since consensus seems to have landed on splitting the patches, I've done
> so. This thread now contains just the default implementation.
That wasn't the consensus. Neither Nicholas or I thought it was
required, but i don't have strong feelings about it.
> diff --git a/libavutil/common.h b/libavutil/common.h
> index 142ff9abe7..e926e7cb02 100644
> --- a/libavutil/common.h
> +++ b/libavutil/common.h
> @@ -291,6 +291,36 @@ static av_always_inline int av_sat_dsub32_c(int a, int b)
> return av_sat_sub32(a, av_sat_add32(b, b));
> }
>
> +/**
> + * Add two signed 64-bit values with saturation.
> + *
> + * @param a one value
> + * @param b another value
> + * @return sum with signed saturation
> + */
> +static int64_t av_sat_add64_c(int64_t a, int64_t b) {
Missing av_always_inline attribute
> + if (b >= 0 && a >= INT64_MAX - b)
> + return INT64_MAX;
> + if (b <= 0 && a <= INT64_MIN - b)
> + return INT64_MIN;
> + return a + b;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Subtract two signed 64-bit values with saturation.
> + *
> + * @param a one value
> + * @param b another value
> + * @return difference with signed saturation
> + */
> +static int64_t av_sat_sub64_c(int64_t a, int64_t b) {
Ditto
> + if (b <= 0 && a >= INT64_MAX + b) {
> + return INT64_MAX;
> + if (b >= 0 && a <= INT64_MIN + b) {
> + return INT64_MIN;
> + return a - b;
> +}
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
