Aside: This overflow check is used in quite a few places now. I wonder if
it's worth having a function like the following:
int64_t av_no_overflow_add(int64_t a, int64_t b) {
return (a > 0 ? b <= INT64_MAX - a : b >= INT64_MIN - a) ? a + b : a;
}
Better name suggestions welcome... av_maybe_add_ts?
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 1:17 PM Dale Curtis <dalecur...@chromium.org> wrote:
> This applies the same workaround used elsewhere in the file for handling
> overflow of addition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dale Curtis <dalecur...@chromium.org>
> ---
> libavformat/utils.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
