Josh de Kock (12020-04-29): > To add to this: > > We could decide to use this every time, but that would have to be done by a > vote. But we can't vote on that with nothing, so hence we have this to begin > somewhere. > > The community and technical committees will be decided by the bootstrapped > general assembly, along with formalising the voting procedures and > processes. Going forward from there it should be a pretty simple case of > just continuing the methods which were chosen.
Indeed. If using the commit count is one of the option on the ballot, then we must have access to the exact implementation to vote: your code must be present on the ballot, or as an annex to the ballot. The mailing-list archives are a reasonable place. But not in the official tree, not before the vote. But for the record, I think that using this code for the bootstrap is a good idea, but using an automatic commit count for future evolutions is a bad idea. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
