On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:07:49 -0300 James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/16/2020 1:26 PM, Philip Langdale wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:33:41 -0300 > > James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> I can withdraw this patch (And remove the relevant chunks from the > >> following two) if this function was effectively not meant for > >> encoders. Also maybe poke Timo regarding nvenc flushing, to see why > >> it is needed and if there's an alternative. > > > > I've pushed the change to formalise the encoder flush semantics, so > > this should be good to apply now. > > All encoders were ported, so yes, it could be pushed. But i wonder if > this should go in after 4.3 is tagged rather than now. I'd like this > to have some months of testing in master before making it into a > release. > > Unless 4.3 is months away, in which case i'll just push it now. Ok. You'll have a better sense of 4.3 timing than me, so I'll defer to your judgement. --phil _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".