On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:07:49 -0300
James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 4/16/2020 1:26 PM, Philip Langdale wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:33:41 -0300
> > James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote:  
> >>
> >> I can withdraw this patch (And remove the relevant chunks from the
> >> following two) if this function was effectively not meant for
> >> encoders. Also maybe poke Timo regarding nvenc flushing, to see why
> >> it is needed and if there's an alternative.  
> > 
> > I've pushed the change to formalise the encoder flush semantics, so
> > this should be good to apply now.  
> 
> All encoders were ported, so yes, it could be pushed. But i wonder if
> this should go in after 4.3 is tagged rather than now. I'd like this
> to have some months of testing in master before making it into a
> release.
> 
> Unless 4.3 is months away, in which case i'll just push it now.

Ok. You'll have a better sense of 4.3 timing than me, so I'll defer to
your judgement.

--phil
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to