On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 20:01:29 -0300 James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The assert needs to be under the following chunk, like it was in the > first version, after we have already established that we're dealing > with a flush enabled encoder to ensure that it's not also wrongly > marked as supporting frame threading. > Otherwise you'll be crashing the user if they call > avcodec_flush_buffers() on an encoder that supports frame threading > but never claimed to support flushing, when we were only supposed to > print the warning and return. *sigh*. Right you are. sending a new one. --phil _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
