On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 08:31:16AM +0000, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 2/28/15, Clement Boesch <u...@pkh.me> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 10:38:32AM +0100, Clement Boesch wrote:
> >> ---
> >>  libavcodec/avuienc.c            | 2 +-
> >>  libavcodec/libopenjpegenc.c     | 4 ++--
> >>  libavcodec/libtheoraenc.c       | 2 +-
> >>  libavcodec/libutvideoenc.cpp    | 2 +-
> >>  libavcodec/libvpxenc.c          | 2 +-
> >>  libavcodec/proresenc_anatoliy.c | 2 +-
> >>  libavcodec/proresenc_kostya.c   | 2 +-
> >>  libavcodec/r210enc.c            | 2 +-
> >>  libavcodec/utvideoenc.c         | 2 +-
> >>  libavcodec/v210enc.c            | 2 +-
> >>  libavcodec/v308enc.c            | 2 +-
> >>  libavcodec/v408enc.c            | 2 +-
> >>  libavcodec/v410enc.c            | 2 +-
> >>  libavcodec/xfaceenc.c           | 2 +-
> >>  libavcodec/y41penc.c            | 2 +-
> >>  libavcodec/yuv4enc.c            | 2 +-
> >>  16 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >>
> >
> > Mmh actually this actually fails for at least r210...
> >
> It does not fail here.
> Patchset ok.

I was confused by the output of FATE, it's not in r210, it's in prores:
    *avctx->coded_frame           = *pic;

This definitely causes problems. I need to check other encoders. I don't
know what to do to fix this particular case.

[...]

-- 
Clément B.

Attachment: pgp4daat1YPXg.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to