On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:29:09PM +0100, wm4 wrote: > On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 22:24:39 +0100 > Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 08:00:03PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote: > > > Le septidi 7 ventôse, an CCXXIII, Michael Niedermayer a écrit : > > > > without pthreads, this seems to fail to build > > > > > > Forgot to test that, sorry. Fixed. > > > > > > By the way, what are the remaining supported cases where threads are not > > > available? > > > > i think the case i tested had HAVE_W32THREADS set > > also theres HAVE_OS2THREADS > > > > [...] > > > > Surely OS/2 support is worth of forcing every single developer who > touches thread stuff to consider a dead platform that's only used by 2 > persons in Korea (?????).
did any mail above sound like it impled that someone has to consider OS/2 ? the existing OS/2 support is maintained by the people using OS/2, AFAIK they never asked others to maintain the support [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Opposition brings concord. Out of discord comes the fairest harmony. -- Heraclitus
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
