On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 01:27:03PM +0100, wm4 wrote: > Doing this check in avutil_version() is not appropriate. Also, this code > is by default disabled (--assert-level is by default 0). A FATE run with > defaults will never execute the checks. > > Move it to the pixelutils test program. Whatever reason there was in > avutil_version() not to run this test by default, it should be fine in > this test program. This means FATE will run the test by default. (Yes, > pixelutils is not strictly the best place for it either, but it's > better.) > > (pixdesc.c also has a small test program, but it's never run by FATE.) > --- > libavutil/pixelutils.c | 3 +++ > libavutil/utils.c | 3 --- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
applied
thanks
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Old school: Use the lowest level language in which you can solve the problem
conveniently.
New school: Use the highest level language in which the latest supercomputer
can solve the problem without the user falling asleep waiting.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
