On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 12:14:32PM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> On date Thursday 2015-02-05 22:57:31 +0100, Clément Bœsch encoded:
> > On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 06:04:56PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 12:49:20PM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > > > On date Wednesday 2015-02-04 16:18:32 +0100, Michael Niedermayer 
> > > > encoded:
> > > > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 12:26:15PM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > > > > > This requires the new sample file matrixbench_mpeg2.lq1.mpg.
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  tests/fate/filter-video.mak |  3 +++
> > > > > >  tests/ref/fate/filter-spp   | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > >  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> > > > > >  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-spp
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > fails on mips and arm
> > > > 
> > > > What kind of failure? (crash or output difference?) Could it be
> > > > related to bit-endianness?
> > > 
> > > you can build with  --disable-asm --disable-yasm
> > > to see the failure on x86
> > 
> > And not reproducible with make fate-filter-spp CPUFLAGS=none?
> 
> Yeah, basically ASM and C code differ.
> 
> ubitux: do you remember if it was the same with the original mp code?

Sorry, I don't remember.

-- 
Clément B.

Attachment: pgpfxcaLfxTuz.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to