On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 02:22:36PM +0100, Christophe Gisquet wrote: > Hi, > > 2015-02-02 13:32 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at>: > > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 07:41:54AM +0100, Christophe Gisquet wrote: > > hmm, is there a reason not to take the original commit unchanged ? > > I was hoping to reduce the difference to openhevc so that we also > > are able to merge future changes from openhevc with few confilcts > > but maybe iam missing something > > Because there are alignment requirements in our dsp, and technically, > adding another buffer (which isn't aligned) while there are already > perfectly good ones is not the best solution (memory-wise and > bookkeeping-wise). >
> I'd go as far as suggest openhevc to align to this version. But maybe > they have diverged too much. iam happy with either openhevc picking this version or us picking the one from openhevc with minimal changes needed to make it work for us.. Though in the first case we should pick the openhevc version and comit our changes in a seperate commit on top so openhevc can more easily pick the changes we made if they want to. either way i hope very much that openhevcs and our implementation could stay similar as divergence would mean duplicated maintaince effort and both projects would have to do extra work in picking changes from the other [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB It is dangerous to be right in matters on which the established authorities are wrong. -- Voltaire
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
