On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:49:44PM +0100, wm4 wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:40:36 +0100
> Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:33 PM, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 04:42:22 +0100
> > > Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> wrote:
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/libavcodec/avcodec.h b/libavcodec/avcodec.h
> > > > index 99467bb..6a0fb5b 100644
> > > > --- a/libavcodec/avcodec.h
> > > > +++ b/libavcodec/avcodec.h
> > > > @@ -503,11 +503,13 @@ enum AVCodecID {
> > > >      AV_CODEC_ID_SSA,
> > > >      AV_CODEC_ID_MOV_TEXT,
> > > >      AV_CODEC_ID_HDMV_PGS_SUBTITLE,
> > > > -    AV_CODEC_ID_DVB_TELETEXT,
> > > > +    AV_CODEC_ID_DVB_VBI,
> > >
> > > Breaks everything, including API and ABI. I guess that's why the patch
> > > is "WIP"?

ive added the "WIP" to shans patch to indicate that it needs more work,
iam actually not sure who will work on it (anshul, akira, shan ?),


> > >
> > 
> > Unless I missed something else, ABI is unaffected since the values didn't
> > change, just the name of the enum entry. A #define would take care of that
> > from the API side of things.
> 
> That would imply the new codec ID is actually compatible with the old
> one. Should it still be renamed?

shan is not subscribed AFAIK so if you dont CC him he wont reply
probably

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Observe your enemies, for they first find out your faults. -- Antisthenes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to