On 30/12/14 10:51 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 7:58 PM, James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 30/12/14 7:57 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 06:20:15PM -0300, James Almer wrote: >>>> Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> >>>> --- >>>> libavcodec/x86/flacdsp.asm | 13 --- >>>> libavutil/x86/x86util.asm | 37 +++++++++ >>>> libswresample/x86/audio_convert.asm | 145 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> libswresample/x86/audio_convert_init.c | 17 ++++ >>>> 4 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >>> >>> looks ok from a quick look and fate passes on linux & mingw 32&64 >> >> Does any fate test deal with 8ch fltp/s32p -> flt/s32 conversion? I don't >> think I've >> seen anything beyond 6ch. >> >> I'll wait a bit to see if i can get a more thorough review before pushing. >> I'm mainly >> interested in having the non-transpose-related 32bits stack usage looked >> at. > > > Looks ok. > > More broadly speaking, I honestly do not tend to go out of my way to get > every last cycle out of 32bit asm anymore nowadays, I mean, if people are > using 32bit, it's their own fault. If they want fast software, they should > get 64bit :)
I know a lot of people stick to x86_32 because of madVR and not because they are using WinXP or whatever, so there's that :P > > Ronald Pushed then, thanks to both. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel